Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-10-29 | 2014-09-29 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note4 is a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a overall score of 77.6 against 75.4. The Galaxy Note4 is an older and a bit heavier device than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but Samsung managed to make it a little bit thinner anyway. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Note4, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also counts with a little bit better screen density.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy Note4. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 3 GB RAM memory. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 17% more battery size. Galaxy Note4 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although it has a worse (4K) video resolution, a camera in the back with a lot worse 16 mega-pixels resolution and a tinier aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.