Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-29 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a general score of 88.3 against 75.4. The Galaxy S10 is a extremely newer phone, and it's also just a bit lighter and thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Galaxy S10 features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 also has 5 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S10 counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a bit larger display, a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a bit greater pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy S10 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a much less MP back-facing camera and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a way bigger aperture to take better low light captures and video.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 3760mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S10 is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.