Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-29 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with a 93.6 score against 75.4. Galaxy S10 5G's design is newer and thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's, although it's also heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 5G and Motorola DROID Turbo 2 both count with quite similar screens, because although the Galaxy S10 5G has a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a larger screen. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S10 5G features just a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back camera with lot less megapixels, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture for better low light captures and video. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features superior battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.