Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-10-29 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 general score. Samsung Galaxy S10e's design is way newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S10e has a bit faster processor than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10e also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10e captures a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a back facing camera with much less mega pixels and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a way larger aperture. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features better battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.