Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is way better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 score. Galaxy S20 is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and a little bit lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Galaxy S20 counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a little bit higher pixel number in each inch of display, a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a quite larger screen.
Galaxy S20 has a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 captures better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a back camera with a way lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light images and videos and a lot better video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a little bit more memory to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3760mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S20, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.