Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's score of 75.4. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is much newer and a little bit thinner, but way heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and Motorola DROID Turbo 2 have quite similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 9 GB more RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures greater videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a much better video quality and a lot more MP camera.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features superior battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 33% more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.