Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2021-01-29 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 722.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a 91.8 score against 75.4. The Galaxy S21 is a incredibly newer and thinner phone than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but it's also just a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy S21 features a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S21 also has 5 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S21 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger display. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S21, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S21 has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S21 shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega-pixels, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
Although Galaxy S21 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S21, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.