Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2021-01-29 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Phantom black and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a score of 98.1, which is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 general score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is a lot heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, it's a bit thinner and much newer. Galaxy S21 Ultra has a better screen than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a quite lower number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3200.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S21 Ultra features a bit better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a way better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot more megapixels camera in the back. Galaxy S21 Ultra has better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.