Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is way better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's overall score of 75.4. The Galaxy S22 body is way newer, just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a bit lower count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S22 has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has 5 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S22 captures greater photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a way higher resolution back camera, a much higher video resolution and a bigger camera aperture. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 and Samsung Galaxy S22 feature incredibly similar batteries, although the Samsung Galaxy S22 has just 3700mAh battery capacity instead of 3760mAh.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S22, else you can save some money and get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.