Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is way better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 score. Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is newer and a bit thinner, but also notably heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a brighter screen than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a quite inferior pixel quantity in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3088px. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much clearer videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a much better video definition and a bigger aperture. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.