Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-29 | -- |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 5.96 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting an 82.6 score against 75.4. The Galaxy S25 is a noticeably thinner and notably lighter phone than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a much better performing CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a brighter display than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite bigger screen. The Galaxy S25 has a way better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back, a lot higher video resolution and a bigger aperture for better captures and video in low light situations.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a much greater storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S25 has a bit longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.