Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2013-03-14 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| -- | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.5 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S4 is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a 76.1 score against 75.4. Galaxy S4 is an much older device than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but it's a lot lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S4, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
Galaxy S4 features just a bit better looking display than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a way lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a little less pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S4, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has a way higher resolution camera in the back, a way better video resolution and a larger aperture. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has a 45% bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S4 is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.