Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2014-06-23 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 5.5 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with a general score of 77.8 against 75.4. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's construction is a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although it was released just a little over a year before. The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although it has a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, a quite lower pixels density and a quite smaller display.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has 4 lesser processing cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The Galaxy S5 Sport's camera is very similar to the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 one, although the Galaxy S5 Sport has a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution, a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and video. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features superior battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3760mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S5 Sport is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.