Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-10-29 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a global score of 79.5, which is a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 general score. Although Galaxy S7 and Motorola DROID Turbo 2 were only released 4 months apart, Galaxy S7 is somewhat thinner and lighter. The Galaxy S7 has a much better screen than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Galaxy S7 also counts with a just a little higher display density.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S7, because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 and Galaxy S7 both have incredibly similar cameras, because although the Galaxy S7 has a lower video definition and a camera with lot less MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S7 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.