Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-10-29 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active has a score of 75.8, which is a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 general score. Galaxy S7 Active is a just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier device than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with more cores (but slower).
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, the Galaxy S7 Active also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S7 Active has just a little better battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 6 percent bigger battery size. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Although Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.