Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-10-29 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is slightly better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a 78.1 score against 75.4. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge body is just a little lighter and thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, even though both of them were released with only a few months difference. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 2560, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also counts with a little bit better count of pixels per inch of display.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with more cores. The Galaxy S7 edge and Motorola DROID Turbo 2 feature similar cameras, because although the Galaxy S7 edge has a back-facing camera with much less MP and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little longer battery duration than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 3760mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.