Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 544 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with an 80.1 score against 75.4. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is way newer, but notably heavier and thicker than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better screen than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2560px, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a just a bit better pixels amount in each inch in the screen.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not so good for taking photos or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much better 21 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a much higher video quality.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.