Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's general score of 75.4. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a noticeably newer cellphone than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although it's just a little bit thicker and notably heavier. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has 1 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a camera that is very similar to the camera in Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit superior battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy XCover Pro, else you can save some money and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.