Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a notably newer and notably thinner cellphone than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although it is also a little bit heavier. Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixels count in each display inch. Galaxy Z Flip takes just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a back camera with much less MP resolution and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos in low light environments.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 14 percent larger battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.