Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.79 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with an 85.6 score against 75.4. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, it's incredibly thinner and also a lot newer. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing images and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot higher resolution camera. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 14 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo 2, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.