Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 135.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a 92.3 score against 75.4. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a little heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, it's extremely thinner and newer. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 5 GB more RAM.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography in low light environments.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.