Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a 94.6 score against 75.4. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a much newer and way thinner device than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although it's a lot heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560px, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photos. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with improved battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3760mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.