Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.79 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's score of 75.4. Although Galaxy Z Fold 3 is heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, it's notably thinner and way newer. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a little better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a little bit better display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way smaller display and a little bit lower 1440 x 2560px resolution, it also counts with a higher pixels amount in each screen inch. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much better 21 MP resolution camera in the back and a bigger aperture. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 3760mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.