Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| 2015-10-29 | 2017-06-01 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ Premium is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a 79.8 score against 75.4. Although the Xperia XZ Premium is somewhat heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, it's somewhat thinner and newer. The Xperia XZ Premium counts with a brighter screen than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a much higher resolution of 2160 x 3840, a higher pixel density and a little bit bigger display.
The Sony Xperia XZ Premium features a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Sony Xperia XZ Premium also has more RAM. Sony Xperia XZ Premium shoots slightly better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega pixels and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, they both have the same aperture.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 3760mAh battery size against 3230mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.