Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-10-29 | 2018-04-05 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Compact is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with a 79 score against 75.4. Xperia XZ2 Compact is a much newer and just a little lighter device than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although it's thicker. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a slightly better screen than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although it has a little bit smaller display, a just a little worse pixel count in each display inch and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2160.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also has more RAM. Xperia XZ2 Compact takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although it has a worse video resolution and a back facing camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, they both have a same size camera aperture.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with improved battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 3760mAh battery capacity against 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.