Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2015-06-16 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a general score of 78.8 against 75.4. Xperia Z4v's body is a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, even though they were only released 5 months apart. The Xperia Z4v counts with a much better looking display than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 2560 x 1440, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a little bit higher pixel number in each inch of display.
The Sony Xperia Z4v features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores, the Sony Xperia Z4v also has a GPU. Xperia Z4v has a little bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although it has a lower video resolution and a less MP back-facing camera, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has superior battery life than Xperia Z4v, because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xperia Z4v is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.