Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-05-09 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a general score of 80.6, which is a little bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 global score. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite's body is noticeably newer than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's, although it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has just a little better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has more RAM.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater display density. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a much better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low light situations and a way better resolution camera.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a much better storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a much better battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.