Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a general score of 87.9 against 75.4. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a noticeably newer and a little thinner phone than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but it's a lot heavier. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 and the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro have very similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and way less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger display.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little faster CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a lot better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a back-facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution, a larger camera aperture and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 3760mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.