Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-02-11 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X2 is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a overall score of 79.3 against 75.4. The Xiaomi Poco X2 is a incredibly newer and just a little thinner phone than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although it is heavier. The Xiaomi Poco X2 features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Xiaomi Poco X2 takes a lot better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also has a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with longer battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.