Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and White | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having an 81.6 score against 75.4. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's design is noticeably newer, but just a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features just a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a larger aperture and a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.