Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a general score of 76.6 against 75.4. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, it's just a bit thinner and newer. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher display pixel density.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's processor is just as good as Motorola DROID Turbo 2's processing unit, they have 8 cpu cores and a 3 GB RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has superior battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 5020mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a larger camera aperture and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.