Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is incredibly newer and a bit thinner, but also heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel density.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a way better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a camera with way more mega-pixels and a larger aperture. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has superior battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 34 percent larger battery size.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.