Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-04-07 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a 79 score against 75.4. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a incredibly newer and a bit thinner cellphone than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but it's also heavier. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a very superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S captures better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a bigger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments and a much better 48 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 34% bigger battery size.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.