Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | ZTE |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2021-06-04 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 35.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a 78.1 score against 75.4. Although ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, it's somewhat thinner and also incredibly newer. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features just a bit better looking screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel count per display inch.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a superior storage to install games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features improved battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Although ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.