Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-27 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A6 is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a score of 75.8 against 74.8. The Samsung Galaxy A6 construction is newer, somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A6, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a very superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A6 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Galaxy A6 also has more cores.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with a lot higher 21 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy A6 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.