Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2015-10-27 | 2013-03-14 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| -- | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S4 has a global score of 76.1, which is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's global score of 74.8. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S4 has 4.4.2 version and Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has Android 5.1 version. The Samsung Galaxy S4 is an older phone than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but it is somewhat thinner and much lighter anyway.
The Galaxy S4 has a bit superior processor than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a graphics processor. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has a just a bit better amount of pixels per inch in the display, a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a quite larger screen.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S4, because it has a 3760mAh battery size.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a little bit better camera than Galaxy S4, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
The Galaxy S4 is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.