Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-27 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a 79.5 score against 74.8. The Samsung Galaxy S7 body is somewhat thinner and lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although both were released with only 5 months difference. The Galaxy S7 has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1440 x 2560, the Galaxy S7 also counts with a little bit greater pixel density.
Galaxy S7 has just a little better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has more RAM and 3 more CPU cores. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S7, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has a 3760mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Galaxy S7 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.