Compare phones
Samsung B3310
GT-B3310| Global Score | |
| 32.6 | 36.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | 2009-08-24 |
| 4.37 x 1.81 x 0.81 inches | 3.58 x 2.13 x 0.67 inches |
| 4.05 ounces | 3.56 ounces |
| $ 50.00 | $ 49.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.9 inches | 2 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 148 pixels per inch | 200 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.7 | 6.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 32,77 MB internal memory | -- |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0.4 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 220 x 176 video resolution | -- |
| 3.63 | 4.73 |
| UMTS, GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 354 hours standby time 3.1 hours talk time | 380 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | Bluetooth 2.1 |
Comparison review
The Samsung B3310 has an overall score of 36.9, which is much better than Motorola E770's overall score of 32.6. Samsung B3310 is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter device than Motorola E770. Samsung B3310 has a brighter screen than Motorola E770, because it has more pixels per display inch, a better 320 x 240 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
The Motorola E770 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung B3310, although it has no SD memory slot. The Motorola E770 and the Samsung B3310 both feature similar processing units, both of them have 0 cores. The Samsung B3310 features a much better camera than Motorola E770, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher 2 megapixels resolution.
Motorola E770 has a really longer battery performance than Samsung B3310, because it has 1100mAh of battery capacity instead of 800mAh.
Samsung B3310 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.