Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Lite is better than HTC One M9, having an 87.1 score against 77.7. These phones include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 20 Lite has newer 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0. Although the Motorola Edge 20 Lite is heavier than HTC One M9, it's somewhat thinner and extremely newer.
HTC One M9 counts with a brighter screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a way smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a quite better screen pixels density. HTC One M9 has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a graphics processor.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite shoots a lot better videos and photos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has faster video frame rate, a way better resolution back-facing camera and a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low light environments.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a really longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 76% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.