Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite is much better than HTC U Ultra, having a global score of 87.1 against 77. Even though the Motorola Edge 20 Lite is extremely newer than HTC U Ultra, it's a little thicker and just a little bit heavier. HTC U Ultra has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
HTC U Ultra has just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with just a little better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite shoots much clearer pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with faster video frame rate and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a much better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.