Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-08-19 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 score. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite body is much newer than LG V30S ThinQ's, but it is just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. These devices include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 20 Lite has older 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a really longer battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with better video frame rates and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.