Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having an 87.1 score against 81.3. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite body is notably newer than the LG V35 ThinQ's, but it's somewhat heavier and a little thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel amount in each inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit more storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent larger battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a lot better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera and faster 120 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.