Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-19 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite is better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having an 87.1 score against 75.8. Motorola Edge 20 Lite's body is newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 20 Lite has an older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little more vivid display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little inferior pixel count per inch of screen, they both have a screen of the same size. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better processor than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a slightly better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing images and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels and better 120 fps video frame rates.
The nubia Red Magic 3S's battery life is just as good as the Motorola Edge 20 Lite one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.