Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Lite has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s score of 75.8. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite is a extremely newer phone than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), although it's heavier and just a bit thicker. Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has a slightly better screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 96 GB more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has a back camera with lot more megapixels and a way higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.