Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has an overall score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A50's global score of 83.8. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite design is way newer, but somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A50. Galaxy A50 has a little bit better screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel amount in each inch in the display.
Galaxy A50's storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as the Motorola Edge 20 Lite one, both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB and equal internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a way better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a back facing camera with way more megapixels. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has greater battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.