Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite's general score of 87.1. Despite being the best device in this review, it must be noted that it's also just a little heavier and just a bit thicker. The Galaxy A52 counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a just a little better pixels amount per inch of display. Galaxy A52 counts with a slightly bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite takes a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A52, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with better video frame rate and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.