Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite, getting a 91.3 score against 87.1. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while Motorola Edge 20 Lite has Android 11, so it gives you a couple additional features and performance enhancements. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is a little bit heavier and a little thicker than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little better processing power than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Galaxy A52 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a just a little better screen density.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing images in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with a way more MP camera and faster video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features slightly more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.