Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-19 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Lite is better than Galaxy A70, having a general score of 87.1 against 76.9. These phones have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, giving some nice extra features and performance enhancements. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite design is noticeably newer, but just a bit thicker and a bit heavier than Galaxy A70.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a screen that's just as good as Motorola Edge 20 Lite's display, both have a screen with the same size, exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution and the same pixel density. The Galaxy A70 has as much memory capacity to install games and applications as the Motorola Edge 20 Lite, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a processor that is very similar to Motorola Edge 20 Lite's CPU, and although the Galaxy A70 has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 20 Lite has just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a way better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photos or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with faster 120 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.