Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite is a bit better than the Galaxy A9 (2018), getting an 87.1 score against 85.2. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite is a newer cellphone than the Galaxy A9 (2018), although it's a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a display that's very similar to Motorola Edge 20 Lite's display, although the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a little bit smaller screen, a just a bit inferior pixels count per inch of display and a quite lower 1080 x 2220 resolution.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite and Galaxy A9 (2018) both count with very similar memory capacity for applications and games, they have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB and equal internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a bit better processing power than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with faster 120 frames per second video frame rate and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.