Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, having a overall score of 98.9 against 87.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Motorola Edge 20 Lite has Android 11 version. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite, but they are 0.32inches thick.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because it has a greater pixel number in each screen inch, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a quite larger display. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a larger aperture to take better images and video in low light situations.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a bit better battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.